Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Silvia Moreno-Garcia's avatar

The never earning an advance myth needs to die. I've earned all my advances so far except two (my eleventh novel is out this year). One took seven years to earn out while for others they earned out by the second statement. It's very different having an advance of $5,000 than getting $500,000. Odds are you'll see royalties much faster when there's a low advance but as you mention, if you are lucky enough to make $500,000 that's not chump change and even if your book only makes you $250,000 in royalties that means the publisher took a gamble and overpaid you. Or not. Many things happen during the lifetime of a book. We're rejacketing one of my novels (a steady, respectable seller that nevertheless is not my most famous or profitable title) for sale next year because trends have changed and it might have a second life with a different cover.

Expand full comment
Martha Bayne's avatar

I'm a lonely voice in the wind on this topic, but the whole mindset of "get the biggest advance you can, don't worry if the publisher is overpaying you, you'll never have to pay it back" is really IMO destructive to the larger project of building a truly sustainable publishing ecosystem. Every book that doesn't earn out its advance makes a publisher less willing to take a risk on the next project. It drives complacency and a herd mentality at the P&L level. Smaller advances, aka "bad advances," which offer a guaranteed annual (or biannual) payment to authors on the back end, help build more diverse and risk-friendly publishing. Like, no other industry works like this! To use the candy example: why would you expect a buyer (publisher) to pay $500,000 up front if the seller (author) was only able to deliver $250,000 worth of candy? Would you ever buy that candy again? Probably not. Lower expectations on the sales end set so many more people up for success.

Anyway, just the POV of a publisher :)

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts